USPTO serial 75980574
WEBTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2001
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WEBTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
REDMOND, WA
REDMOND, WA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WIILIAM O. FERRON, JR.
William O. Ferron, Jr. Seed IP Law Group PLLC701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Electronic on-line hosting of electronic shop-at-home services in the field of general consumer products, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, caps, jackets, toys, puzzles, balls, kites, flying discs, yo-yos, writing instruments, stationery, portfolios, posters, calendars, photographs, and binders; electronic on-line hosting of electronic shop-at-home [ servides ] * services * via global computer network access devices in the field of promotional items relating to on-line access service | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 1996 |
| 038 | Computer services, namely, providing facilities for real-time interaction with other global computer network users concerning topics of general interest via chat rooms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBTV NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBTV NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROSOFT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MICROSOFT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Perlman, Stephen G.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named WEBTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |