USPTO serial 75980608
PHYSICIANS' TELECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHYSICIANS' TELECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony H. Handal
ANTHONY H HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSIKY80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT, NAMELY COMPUTER DATABASE HARDWARE, DATABASE SERVERS, WEB SERVERS, TELEPHONES, COMPUTER NETWORKING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, CELLULAR PHONES, PAGERS, WIRELESS PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVERS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, WEB BROWSERS, COMPUTER TELEPHONY INTERFACE CARDS, FOR PROVIDING TELEPHONE SERVICES, ON-LINE SERVICES, PAGER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, DATABASE SERVICES AND COMPUTING SERVICES; EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MICROPHONES, HEADSETS, MODEMS, FAX MACHINES, COMPUTER DATA STORAGE HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, MULTI-USER TELEPHONE CONFERENCING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING VOICE MAIL AND AUTOMATED ANSWERING SERVICES; NETWORK TELEPHONES FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES WITH VOICE ACTIVATED FEATURES, MESSAGING DISPLAYED ON A MENU-DRIVEN SCREEN ASSOCIATED WITH THE EQUIPMENT THROUGH WHICH THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |