Drawing for WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75980697

WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2499231Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2001
Examiner
TOLPIN, BRETT
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT E. SMARTSCHAN

ROBERT E. SMARTSCHAN KAUFMAN & CANOLES150 West Main StreetSuite 2100NORFOLK, VA 23510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Security printing, namely, encoding identification information on valuable documents and products; Lithographic printing; Portrait printing; Printing design; Silk screen Printing; Printing and graphic art design; Providing printing fonts by means of electronic transmission which can then be downloaded by receiving users; Commercial Art design, Art design graphic; Packaging design for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 5, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
May 18, 2012CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9โ€”
Mar 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Apr 17, 20098.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 8, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Feb 11, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSEDโ€”
Nov 7, 2008PRA8RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8โ€”
Nov 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 5, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Nov 5, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
May 13, 2008PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8โ€”
Apr 29, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGALโ€”
Apr 14, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 26, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Oct 16, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jul 24, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Apr 21, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Apr 12, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Feb 9, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 10, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTEDโ€”
Dec 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Dec 6, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Oct 11, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILEDโ€”
Oct 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Dec 14, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Feb 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance