USPTO serial 75980697
WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2001
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E. SMARTSCHAN
ROBERT E. SMARTSCHAN KAUFMAN & CANOLES150 West Main StreetSuite 2100NORFOLK, VA 23510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Security printing, namely, encoding identification information on valuable documents and products; Lithographic printing; Portrait printing; Printing design; Silk screen Printing; Printing and graphic art design; Providing printing fonts by means of electronic transmission which can then be downloaded by receiving users; Commercial Art design, Art design graphic; Packaging design for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Workflow Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| May 18, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Apr 17, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Feb 11, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | โ |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | โ |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| May 13, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | โ |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | โ |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Oct 16, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | โ |
| Apr 21, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Apr 12, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 10, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Dec 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Dec 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Oct 11, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |