Drawing for SMART

USPTO serial 75980715

SMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

V T GIORDANO

V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN JANSSEN & GI60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165-0006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035referrals in the field of auto care services, namely, arranging for auto care services, automobile leasing, automobile parking and automobile transportation; invoicing services in the field of automobiles to replace leased or rental automobilesACTIVE—
036insurance services, namely, underwriting extended warranty contracts in the field of automobiles; administration in the field of automobile insuranceACTIVE—
037auto care services, particularly, cleaning, maintenance, repair, and the replacement of auto parts and accessoriesACTIVE—
039leasing of automobiles; automobile parking; transporation of persons by automobiles, and goods and automobiles by trucks; travel agency services, namely, arranging for reservations and bookings for transporationACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, conducting class and road instruction in the field of automobiles and automobile safetyACTIVE—
042technical consultation and research relating to automobiles; travel agency services, namely, arranging for reservations and bookings for temporary lodgingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 24, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 29, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 10, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 6, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance