USPTO serial 75980766
GRIPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-581 88 Linkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHY J LALOR
CATHY J LALOR GRAHAM CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | firearms, ammunition and projectiles; explosives; fireworks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |