USPTO serial 75980779
DENTAL DELIVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2002
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DENTAL DELIVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E NAGAE
JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized on-line retail services, mail order catalog services, mail order services and retail store services in the field of dental hygiene products, namely, dental rinse, dental adhesives, dental cleaning preparations, dental floss, dental picks, tooth brushes, tooth gel, tooth paste and hygiene and therapeutic irrigation appliances, liquid-jet-emitting fixtures and power toothbrush units for use therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |