USPTO serial 75980780
NUMERICAL ON-LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2499109Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2001
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NUMERICAL ON-LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CHICAGO, IL
Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
HOUSTON, TX
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alina S. Morris
Alina S. Morris Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and user documentation therefor for monitoring processes in the food processing industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FMC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FMC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FMC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NUMERICAL ON-LINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 28, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |