USPTO serial 75980834
NEUTROGENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2613839Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 2002
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEUTROGENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
Amy E. Carroll Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | pressed powder | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |