Drawing for COME GET SOME

USPTO serial 75980853

COME GET SOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COME GET SOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and video products, namely, video game machines for use with televisions; video game cartridges; video game tape cassettes; pre-recorded video tapes featuring computer games and computer game characters; motion picture films featuring video games and video game characters; television game programs featuring computer games and computer game characters; television game consoles; computer game analog controllers; computer game joysticks; memory cards, computer game software; computer game discs; computer game programs; computer game cassettes, computer game tapes, computer game cartridges, computer software featuring computer games that can be downloaded through a global computer network; multimedia software recorded on a CD-ROM featuring computer games; computers, computer hardware and computer firmware for use in operating computer games; computer mouse padsACTIVE—
041entertainment services in the nature of the production of prerecorded video cassettes, video discs, and laser discs; entertainment services in the nature of the production of live-action and animated motion picture films for television; entertainment services in the nature of computer games provided and played through a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, live performances by a musical rock groupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 5, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 29, 20011.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jan 29, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance