USPTO serial 75980951
SUCCESSFUL AGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUCCESSFUL AGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chuo-ku Tokyo 104-10, JP
Chuo-ku Tokyo 104-10, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N. ARONSON
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, SEMINARS, PRACTICAL TRAINING IN THE FORM OF EDUCATIONAL DEMONSTRATIONS, ACADEMIES, COLLOQUIUMS, SYMPOSIUMS, AND CONFERENCES ALL IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, BEAUTY, PERSONAL CARE AND NUTRITION; EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, BEAUTY, PERSONAL CARE AND NUTRITION RENDERED THROUGH CORRESPONDENCE COURSES; ORGANIZING EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, BEAUTY, PERSONAL CARE AND NUTRITION; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS; AND TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, BEAUTY, PERSONAL CARE AND NUTRITION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | BEAUTY SALONS, HAIRDRESSING SALONS, PROVIDING FASHION INFORMATION, HEALTH CARE, PHYSICAL THERAPY, COSMETICS RESEARCH AND FOOD NUTRITION CONSULTATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |