USPTO serial 75981059
3GPP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3GPP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | ENCODING OF MAGNETIC TAPES, DISCS, HARD COMPUTER DRIVES, FLOPPY DISCS, TRANSMISSION WIRES, OPTICAL DEVICES AND SIM CARDS WITH COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by European Telecommunications Standards Institute
- Other trademarks owned by European Telecommunications Standards Institute
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named 3GPP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |