USPTO serial 75981085
REMOTEPCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2616071Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 2002
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REMOTEPCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and electronic apparatus for recording, processing, transmitting, switching, storing and outputting communications, signals and data, namely, computers and microcomputers, parts thereof and systems composed thereof, namely, high speed data interconnects, servers, video links, high speed scanners and printers, computer bus couplings; digital display applications, namely, remote display links; medical applications, namely, high-speed data interconnects for x-ray and scanner units; computer hardware; integrated circuits (chips) and microprocessors; computer peripherals, namely, terminals, monitors, circuit boards and auxiliary boards, circuit boards for peripheral component interconnect, field bus connections, modems, network and data transmission devices essentially consisting of connection structural components, data and speech processors, interface apparatus, memories; computer programs, structural components for high speed data transmission between apparatus, computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |