USPTO serial 75981160
REDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Aldo Group Inc./Le Groupe Aldo Inc., The
Ville St-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Aldo Group Inc./Le Groupe Aldo Inc., The
Aldo Group Inc./Le Groupe Aldo Inc., The
Ville St-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Aldo Group Inc./Le Groupe Aldo Inc., The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aldo Group Inc./Le Groupe Aldo Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Aldo Group Inc./Le Groupe Aldo Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named REDA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |