USPTO serial 75981324
CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Liverpool, L1 4BX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH E DANISH
KEITH E DANISH TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORSOF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010-7108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPACT DISCS, PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES, ALL FEATURING MUSIC; MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING MUSIC; COMPUTER GAMES SOFTWARE' SPECTACLES, SPECTACLE CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES RELATING TO MUSIC AND TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SERVICES, NAMELY,PUBLICATION OF TEXT AND GRAPHIC WORKS OF OTHERS ON CD-ROMs FEATURING MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CONFERENCES RELATING TO MUSIC; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS, VIDEO TAPES, RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; RECORDING STUDIO SERVICES; LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |