USPTO serial 75981343
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London, EC1R 3ER, GB
London, EC1R 3ER, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANN K. FORD, ESQ.
THOMAS E ZUTIC PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather goods, namely, wallets, purses, bags for shopping and travel; umbrellas; and walking sticks | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, leather and imitation leather coats, jackets and gloves; coats, t-shirts, sweatshirts, trousers, scarves, shirts and socks; headgear, namely, hats, caps and baseball caps; and footwear | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, stuffed toys, plush toys, wind-up toys, and toy vehicles; games, namely, board games and card games; playthings, namely, playhouses and play figures | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, assisting others with the purchase of real estate by financial information processing, financial planning, management and research, analysis and consultation and loan financing; financial services, namely, analyzing, consulting, advising and providing information in the field of shares, house purchase, real estate, bank cards, business, credit cards, insurance, investment, mortgages, personal equity plans, property, real estate property and buildings, savings, securities, stocks, sale of property, the securing of funds and financial products; sponsorship services, namely, financial sponsorship of sporting events, trade shows, seminars, conferences or exhibitions; financial sponsorship of charitable events; real estate services, namely, real estate appraisal and brokerage; provision of information about finance; all of the aforesaid services also provided on line from a computer database, Web site or the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |