USPTO serial 75981395
BERTINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2002
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BERTINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Yarraville Victoria, AU
Yarraville Victoria, AU
WEST SUNSHINE, VICTORIA, AU
Yarraville Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Nix
WILLIAM P NIX BAKER & BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Baby strollers; baby carriages; car seats for infants and toddlers; hand propelled trolleys; grocery carts; and parts and accessories for the aforementioned goods, namely, steering mechanisms, wheels, suspension components and chassis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IGC (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by IGC (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by IGC DOREL PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by IGC (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BERTINI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |