USPTO serial 75981415
ENLIGHTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2004
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENLIGHTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
Cedar Rapids, IA
Other trademarks owned by Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
Cedar Rapids, IA
Other trademarks owned by Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
Cedar Rapids, IA
Other trademarks owned by Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allan L. Harms
RICHARD PUNDT ENLIGHTEN TECHNOLOGIES INC330 FIRST ST SE STE ACEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | referring remote computer users to providers of communication services, teleconferencing services, court reporting services and expert witness services, over a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | providing computer services to remote computer users over a global computer network; providing online databases featuring legal information, research and general information to remote computer users over a global computer network; referring remote computer users to providers of communication services, teleconferencing services, court reporting services, expert witness services, over a global computer network; providing law-practice related information including directories of law-related consultants and service providers and statutory and case law, to remote computer users over a global computer network; providing audio teleconferencing, video teleconferencing, electronic transmission of data and documents, electronic transmission of audio, video, and data; providing court reporting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Enlighten Technologies Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENLIGHTEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |