USPTO serial 75981450
REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP FURGANG
STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR FURGANG & ADWAR LLP2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Association services, namely, promoting the interest of advocates for women's reproductive rights; promoting public awareness of women's reproductive rights issues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |