USPTO serial 75981511
GREAT VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2572031Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2002
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREAT VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bentonville, AR
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S7, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S7, CA
Bentonville, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth Oh
Kenneth Oh Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.702 SW 8th StreetBentonville, AR 72716-0520UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed fish and poultry[; processed edible seeds;] and soups and soup mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAWS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAWS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named GREAT VALUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |