USPTO serial 75981581
SHISEIDO STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHISEIDO STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N ARONSON
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS; PERFUMERIES, NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE; COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIP STICK, BLUSH, ROUGE, MAKEUP, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, HAIR GEL; SKIN CARE AND BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CREAM, SKIN CONDITIONER, BODY MASKS, BODY OILS, BODY POWDER | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | COMBS, NAMELY, HAIR COMBS; CLEANING COMBS; SPONGES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSE, SCOURING SPONGES; BRUSHES, NAMELY, HAIR BRUSHES, DISHWASHING BRUSHES, DUSTING BRUSHES; BEVERAGE GLASSWARE, MUGS MADE OF PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE; ARTICLES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, NAMELY, CLEANING RAGS, CLEANING POT BRUSHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |