USPTO serial 75981587
NOVAVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2006
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NOVAVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Medinova Medical Consulting GmbH
D-39120 Magdeburg, DE
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Medinova Medical Consulting GmbH
D-39120 Magdeburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance BlvdSuite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus for diagnosing and treating nervous system, neurological, ophthalmological and neuropsychological impediments; medical apparatus used for testing and treating eyesight-handicapped people, namely, visual diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, software, and instructional manuals provided together as a unit | ACTIVE | Jan 28, 2004 |
| 016 | Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials for use in the fields of medicine and neuropsychology, namely, handbooks providing information on the diagnosis and treatment of neuropsychological, neurological and ophthalmological impairments for eyesight-handicapped people | ACTIVE | Jan 28, 2004 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting training course in the fields of medicine and neuropsychology | ACTIVE | Jan 28, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Medinova Medical Consulting GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by NOVAVISION INC
- Other trademarks owned by NOVAVISION INC
- Other trademarks owned by Medinova Medical Consulting GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NOVAVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |