USPTO serial 75981626
ALARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Moskowitz
Max Moskowitz Ostrolenk Faber LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | managed health care services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |