USPTO serial 75981641
CYBER CENTURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBER CENTURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LANGDON OWENS
LANGDON OWENS PARSONS DAVIES KINGHORN & PETERS185 S STATE ST 7TH FLSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely, books, magazines, journals, brochures, pamphlets, news bulletins, newsletters and supplements thereto, and directories in the fields of communications, telecommunications, broadcasting, computer and information technology and services | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1999 |
| 035 | business management services, including, strategic planning, analysis, and planning in the fields of communications, telecommunications, broadcasting, computer and information technology and services | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1999 |
| 038 | multimedia broadcasting, namely, audio, radio, television and video | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1999 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, training, conducting seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of communications, telecommunications, broadcasting, multimedia programming services, computer and information technology and services | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1999 |
| 042 | research, analysis and consulting services in the fields of communications, telecommunications, broadcasting, computer and information technology and computer services, namely, providing multiple-users access to a computer database in the nature of a computer bulletin board featuring information in the fields of communications, telecommunications, broadcasting, computer and information technology and computer services | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOUGAN, DIANA L.
- Other trademarks owned by DOUGAN, DIANA L.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYBER CENTURY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |