USPTO serial 75981667
VAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton Chirnomas
SHIBOLETH YISRAELI ROBERTS ZISMAN & CO350 FIFTH AVE60TH FLNEW YORK CITY, NY 10118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Client/server computer software; computer software for creating, displaying and exchanging music videos; and computer for creating, displaying and exchanging music videos; and computer software for creating, displaying and exchanging music videos that may be uploaded to and downloaded from a global computer network | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 2000 |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely providing a web site for the display and exchange of music videos | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |