USPTO serial 75981688
NORTHWEST SELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NORTHWEST SELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BELLINGHAM, WA
Bellingham, WA
BELLINGHAM, WA
BELLINGHAM, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Gary
J SCOTT GARY KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL1201 THIRD AVE STE 2900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3028UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROWN & COLE STORES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BROWN & COLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROWN & COLE STORES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BROWN & COLE STORES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named NORTHWEST SELECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |