USPTO serial 75981699
GOOD SENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOOD SENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lloyd A. Heneveld
LLC A HENEVELD KENMOORPRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTONP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Thermometers for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |