USPTO serial 75981730
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CALIFON, NJ
Califon, NJ
Ascend Media Medical and Healthcare, LLC
Overland Park, KS
Other trademarks owned by Ascend Media Medical and Healthcare, LLC
Ascend Media Medical and Healthcare, LLC
Overland Park, KS
Other trademarks owned by Ascend Media Medical and Healthcare, LLC
CALIFON, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald M. Kraai and the law firm of LATHROP & GAGE L.C., with offices in Kansas City, Missouri; Overland Park, Kansas; St. Louis, Missouri; Jefferson City, Missouri; Springfield, Missouri; Boulder, Colorado and New York, New York; which has associated wit
GERALD M KRAAI LATHROP & GAGE LC2345 GRAND BLVD STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2684UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing an on-line database featuring continuing medical education, namely, information on state of the art medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, treatment procedures and techniques | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |