USPTO serial 75981781
EHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katharine F Rowe
KATHARINE F ROWE LEBOEUF LAMB GREENE & MACRAE LLP50 N LAURA ST STE 2800JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202-3634UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Technical equipment, namely, telecommunications modems, computers, television sets, radios, telephones, burglar alarms for home use, DVD players, central vacuum cleaner equipment, home viewing projection screens, facsimile machines, computer printers, satellite dishes, video cassette recorders, compact disks players, surround sound speakers, electrical light switches, electrical light wiring, electrical light controls, dimmer switches, computer software to facilitate connection to and use of the Internet and intranets, remote control devices for entertainment, lighting and security equipment, structured wiring distribution panels, and internet appliances, namely hand-held and wireless devices providing internet access, web browsers, web pads, web tablets, cellular phones, and personal digital assistants | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 037 | Installation maintenance and repair of communications, lighting, security, entertainment, computer, central vacuum cleaner, and home automation equipment, and installation, maintenance and repair of the wiring for such equipment | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 038 | providing multiple-user access to computer information networks, namely the internet and intranets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of communications, entertainment, lighting, security, computer, central vacuum cleaner and home automation equipment and wiring therefor | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ehouse company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EHOUSE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |