USPTO serial 75981890
KVM OVER IP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KVM OVER IP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
JAY D BERQUIST ESQ DAVIDSON, BERQUIST, KLIMA & JACKSON, LLP4501 N FAIRFAX DR STE 920ARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PERIPHERALS ALLOWING A PLURALITY OF USERS TO INDEPENDENTLY ACCESS AND CONTROL A PLURALITY OF COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS FOR REMOTE ACCESS AND CONTROL OF COMPUTERS AND SERVERS; REMOTE CONTROL APPARATUS FOR COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT WITH EACH OF THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |