Drawing for DREAMCOTTON

USPTO serial 75981935

DREAMCOTTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAMCOTTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016plastic bags, envelopes and pouches for merchandise packaging; paper bags, envelopes and pouches for merchandise packaging; paper bags; paper bags for packaging; envelopes; paper envelopes for packaging; cardboard boxes; cardboard mailing tubes; newspaper advertising columns; plastic film for industrial or commercial wrapping; blank or partially printed labels not of textiles; printed labels not of textiles; printed forms; printed patterns; stationery; stationery holders; stationery boxes; stationery writing paper and envelopes; adhesive tape for stationery or household use; wrapping paperACTIVE—
040applying finishes to cloth, bleaching of cloth, dyeing of fabric, preparation and treatment of fabric; all aforementioned services for third partiesACTIVE—
042printing services for third partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance