Drawing for DREAM LINEN

USPTO serial 75981939

DREAM LINEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAM LINEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper bags, envelopes and pouches for merchandise packaging; paper bags; paper bags for packaging; envelopes; paper envelopes for packaging; cardboard boxes; cardboard mailing tubes; newspaper advertising columns; blank or partially printed labels not of textiles; printed labels not of textiles; printed forms; printed patterns; stationery; stationery holders; stationery boxes; stationery writing paper and envelopes; wrapping paperACTIVEDec 31, 2003
040applying finishes to cloth, bleaching of cloth, dyeing of fabric, preparation and treatment of fabric; all services on behalf of third partiesACTIVEDec 31, 2003
042printing services on behalf of third parties in the textile fieldACTIVEDec 31, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2005MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Aug 14, 2005ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2005CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 28, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 28, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 8, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance