USPTO serial 75982086
KIBUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KIBUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kabushiki Kaisha Kibun Shokuhin
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Kabushiki Kaisha Kibun Shokuhin
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Kabushiki Kaisha Kibun Shokuhin
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Hudgins
Christie Baty Hudgins Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ soy bean-based beverages made by adding vegetable oils, sugar, salt and others; soybean-based beverages made by adding sugar and juices of vegetables; soybean-based beverages made by fermentation of lactobacteriaceae; edible oils and fats; milk; fermented milk; fermented lactic acid-based drinks; lactic acid and lactic bacteria-based beverages, namely, yogurt-based beverages; meats; dried meats; sausages; canned meats; bottled meats; tsukudani of meat, namely, preserved meats boiled in soy sauce; ham; bacon; eggs; baked eggs; pre-cooked seafood; ] steamed, baked, boiled, and frozen fish cakes; deep [ dried ] * fried * fish cakes; [ deep fried fish cakes with shrimp; fried fish cakes consisting primarily of bream and bean curd; ] fried fish cake with burdock [ ; baked eel; salt pickled squid; seasoned sardines; sweet-boiled goby and carp; broiled dace, smelt, shrimp, clam; pickled octopus, pickled shad fillets; seasoned octopus; herring with seasoned seaweed; mackerel marinated in vinegar; soybean-based beverages; flavored soybean-based beverages; soy-based beverages used as a milk substitute; soups, namely, soba-tsuyu and udon-tsuyu; soup stock; boxed lunches consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; and whey-based beverages ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ seasonings, spices, flavored ices; salad dressings; white sauce; spices; cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals; noodles; uncooked udon noodles, namely, Japanese noodles of wheat flour; uncooked soba noodles, namely, Japanese noodles of buckwheat flour; uncooked somen noodles, namely, very thin wheat noodles; seasoned coatings for dumplings stuffed with minced pork; unseasoned coatings for dumplings stuffed with minced pork; soya flour; spaghetti; macaroni; pasta; ravioli; sandwiches; sushi; pizzas; boxes lunches consisting primarily of bread, pasta or rice; meat pies; flavored syrup ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Kibun Shokuhin
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Kibun Shokuhin
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Kibun Shokuhin
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KIBUN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |