USPTO serial 75982200
ROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rego park, NY
Jackson hights, NY
CORONA, NY
DJ AUTO SECURITY & ACCESSORIES, INC.
CORONA, NY
Other trademarks owned by DJ AUTO SECURITY & ACCESSORIES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard C. Miskin
HOWARD C MISKIN350 FIFTH AVE STE 6110NEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | ANTI-THEFT ALARMS AND DEVICES FOR VEHICLES, COMPRISING A MONITORING AND ALARM SYSTEM WITH PAGER WHICH SIGNALS IF SOMEONE BREAKS INTO THE CAR; BRAKE SECURITY DEVICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chen, Tiffany
- Other trademarks owned by Chen, Jian
- Other trademarks owned by Chen, Dennis Q.
- Other trademarks owned by DJ AUTO SECURITY & ACCESSORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ROCK
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |