USPTO serial 75982307
VIRGIN VIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2643644Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2002
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRGIN VIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Norvell
Joseph V. Norvell Norvell IP llc1776 Ash StreetNorthfield, IL 60093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Perfumes; eau-de-cologne;] non-medicated toilet preparations, namely, lotions and moisturizers; non-medicated preparations for the care of the skin, hands, scalp and body, namely, moisturizers, lotions, creams and gels; non-medicated skin cleansing preparations,namely, lotions, creams and gels; creams and lotions for the skin [; nail varnishes ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named VIRGIN VIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |