USPTO serial 75982335
HYDROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2992723Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HYDROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CALVIN E THORPE
PETER M DE JONGE THORPE N & WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | robots that operate under water for recreational use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SARCOS INVESTMENTS LC
- Other trademarks owned by SARCOS L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SARCOS INVESTMENTS LC
- Other trademarks owned by STERLING INVESTMENTS LC
- Other trademarks owned by SARCOS L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SARCOS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named HYDROBOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |