USPTO serial 75982373
GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOOD HOUSEKEEPING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bridgette Fitzpatrick
Bridgette Fitzpatrick Hearst Communications, Inc.959 Eighth AvenueNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | household and kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, large serving spoons, slotted spoons, all purpose portable household containers, metal pans, pots, pans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |