USPTO serial 75982475
CHEF'S COUNCIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEF'S COUNCIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1214 Vernier, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Poffenberger
JOHN D POFFENBERGER2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the food and beverage field in the manner of discussion, identification, research and development of food trends, ingredients, product ideation, menu development, and cooking techniques; food and beverage development and research; culinary services, namely, food preparation, food and beverage product development, and development of food and beverage recipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |