Drawing for CHEF'S COUNCIL

USPTO serial 75982475

CHEF'S COUNCIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEF'S COUNCIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Poffenberger

JOHN D POFFENBERGER2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the food and beverage field in the manner of discussion, identification, research and development of food trends, ingredients, product ideation, menu development, and cooking techniques; food and beverage development and research; culinary services, namely, food preparation, food and beverage product development, and development of food and beverage recipesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance