USPTO serial 75982522
COLONEL BOGEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLONEL BOGEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred J. Emery
FRED J EMERY3526 QUESADA ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely books, instruction pamphlets and newsletters in the field of golf and golf instruction; calendars; greeting cards; cartoon coloring books; personal time planners, stationery; and playing cards | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1981 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely providing seminars in the field of golf entertainment featuring pre-recorded golf oriented humorous programs | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |