Drawing for MASTERFOODSERVICES

USPTO serial 75982597

MASTERFOODSERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2724795Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2003
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MASTERFOODSERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Soup mixes, rice, rice mixes, sauces, marinades, stuffing mixes, rice pudding mixes and pasta mixesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 6, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 26, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 13, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 12, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 25, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 24, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jul 11, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 31, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance