USPTO serial 75982631
VIGILINX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIGILINX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Parsippany, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, ET AL12010 SUNSET HLS RDSTE 900RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business security consulting services | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2002 |
| 037 | maintenance of computer networks | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2002 |
| 042 | providing digital security and computer network and information technology security services for others; namely, firewall and virtual private network development and management, network security policy auditing and development, network security development, implementation monitoring, administration and maintenance, network penetration testing services, design and implementation of public key infrastructures; computer security consulting services, namely, network attack, penetration, threat and vulnerability assessment services, network security architecture planning and design; network security policy and procedure development; application security assessment; information security organizational design; network security due diligence; computer network integration and co-sourcing services, namely platform-specific integration, product-specific integration, security integration for applications and systems, information security testing; computer network investigation and forensic services, namely, on-site and off-site forensic lab services, information security incident investigation, information security forensic analysis, information security evidence and recovery planning and analysis; managed computer security services, namely, network perimeter intrusion detection, host intrusion alerting, development and monitoring of virtual private networks, firewall management, development and maintenance of subscription-based network security policies, standards and procedures, network vulnerability and security research; development and maintenance of computer network security architecture policies, namely best practices, intelligence data, strategic analyses, product analyses, and strategic trend data and information | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |