USPTO serial 75982639
SONDIUS-XG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SONDIUS-XG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Shizuoka-ken, JP
Shizuoka-ken, JP
Shizuoka-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRET E FIELD
MICHELLE D KAHN Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP1900 University AvenueSuite 200East Palo Alto, CA 94303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | large scale integrated computer chips for generating, effecting, recording, reproducing, sequencing sound or music | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SONDIUS-XG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |