USPTO serial 75982667
ADVANCED QUALITY & ULTIMATE ART AQUA WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED QUALITY & ULTIMATE ART AQUA WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Higashinari-ku, Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Price
JOSEPH W PRICE PRICE, GESS & UBELL2100 S E MAIN ST STE 250IRVINE, CA 92714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Plumbing fittings, namely, faucets for bath, kitchen and basins, thermostatic mixers for water pipes, wall type cranks for water supply, pillar type cranks for water supply, bushings, washers, inlet spuds, saddle bands, bath mixers, water massage showers, hand shower sets comprising of shower heads, shower hoses and shower arms, shower valves, two-way sink taps, single lever mixers, sink taps, bath taps, basin taps, time-delay self closing taps, swinging sink taps, laboratory pillar taps, basin mixers, flush valves, filtration taps, filtration cartridges, ball taps, urinal flush valves, toilet flush valves, gate valves, stop cocks, ball valves, vertical corks, floor strainers; water fountains; lawn sprinkler systems comprising pumps, valves and filters | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastic pipes for use in plumbing; plastic hoses for use in plumbing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |