USPTO serial 75982722
EXTREME SPORTS CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXTREME SPORTS CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1062 HK Amsterdam, NL
Extreme Sports Channel Limited
Sudbury, Suffolk CO10 2AA, GB
Extreme Sports Channel Limited
Sudbury, Suffolk CO10 2AA, GB
1062 HK Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Mulholland
Susan M. Mulholland Gesmer Updegrove LLP40 Broad StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BLANK MAGNETIC TAPES AND DISCS; PRERECORDED TAPES AND DISCS CONTAINING SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, NEWS, RECREATIONAL, MUSICAL OR CULTURAL PROGRAMS; BLANK VIDEOTAPES, VIDEOCASSETTES; GRAMOPHONE RECORDS CONTAINING SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, NEWS, RECREATIONAL, MUSICAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS; PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES, VIDEOCASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS, VIDEO CASSETTES, VIDEOTAPES, DVDS, CD-ROMS, VIDEO COMPACT DISCS OR VIDEODISCS CONTAINING SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, NEWS, RECREATIONAL, MUSICAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS CONTAINING SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATIONAL OR CULTURAL PROGRAMS; DEVICES FOR THE BEFORE MENTIONED PRODUCTS INSOFAR AS NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY APPARATUS FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES, VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR TELEVISIONS; SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER GAMES; PROGRAMS FOR COMPUTER GAMES; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; VIDEO GAME TAPE CASSETTES; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME DISCS; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES NAMELY, DISCS, CASSETTES, OR CARTRIDGES; PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR; BICYCLE AND SKATE HELMETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKS, PAPERS, MAGAZINES AND PERIODICALS RELATED TO SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATION OR CULTURE OR CONTAINING INFORMATION IN THIS FIELD; PHOTOGRAPHS, POSTERS, LEAFLETS, PAMPHLETS ALL RELATED TO RADIO, TELEVISION, RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAMS FEATURING SPORTS, NEWS, GAMES, MOVIES, MUSIC, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL EVENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING NAMELY, PANTS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, SOCKS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SWEATERS, JACKETS, FOOTWEAR, CAPS AND HEADWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SPORTING AND GYMNASTIC ARTICLES AND EQUIPMENT INSOFAR AS NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY FOOTBALLS, RUGBY BALLS, TENNIS BALLS; SPORTS BALLS, RACQUETS, SNOWBOARDS; WATER SPORT EQUIPMENT INSOFAR AS NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY SWIM BOARDS, SURFBOARDS; SPORTING ARTICLES EQUIPMENT INSOFAR AS NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, FOR USE IN SKATEBOARDING, IN-LINE SKATING, CYCLING, CLIMBING, AND BIKING SPORTS, NAMELY, SKATEBOARDS, IN-LINE SKATES, KNEE-PADS, ELBOW-PADS, PROTECTIVE HANDWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UPC Programming B. V.
- Other trademarks owned by Extreme Sports Channel Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Extreme Sports Channel Limited
- Other trademarks owned by UPC Programming B. V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named EXTREME SPORTS CHANNEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |