Drawing for NOVACALCIUM

USPTO serial 75982742

NOVACALCIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOVACALCIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Friedman

NOVARTIS CORPORATION564 MORRIS AVESUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dairy-based food beverages; Dairy-based chocolate food beverages; Vegetable-based food beverages; Vegetable-based chocolate food beveragesACTIVE—
030Processed cereals; Breakfast cereals; Cereal based snack foods; Ready to eat cereal derived food bars; Grain-based food beverages; Ice cream, frozen yogurt, ice milk and ice cream substitute; Coffee; Coffee-based, beverages; Coffee-based, preparations for making beverages; Food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or fillerACTIVE—
032Fruit drinks; Fruit juices; Soft drinks; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of fruit drinks, fruit juices and soft drinks; Fruit juice concentrates; Fruit flavored soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Dec 13, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance