USPTO serial 75982748
FOG-OUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOG-OUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy L. Gilson
AMY L GILSON MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP1001 PAGE MILL RD BLDG 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Coatings for ophthalmic lenses, anti-reflective coatings for ophthalmic lenses, abrasion resistant coatings for ophthalmic lenses; impact resistant coatings for ophthalmic lenses,; anti-fog coatings for ophthalmic lenses | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |