USPTO serial 75982772
UNCOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNCOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H BERNSTEIN
DAVID H BERNSTEIN DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON919 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing information in the fields of history and the sciences by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | May 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |