Drawing for IRETURNS.COM LEVEL YOUR IPLAYING FIELD

USPTO serial 75982781

IRETURNS.COM LEVEL YOUR IPLAYING FIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRETURNS.COM LEVEL YOUR IPLAYING FIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK H. TIDMAN

MARK H TIDMAN PIPER RUDNICK1200 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING RETAIL OUTLETS FOR PURCHASING THE MERCHANDISE OF OTHERS AND FOR THE RECEIPT, EXCHANGE, OR RETURN OF MERCHANDISE PURCHASED FROM OTHERS, MARKETING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING MERCHANDISE SAMPLES TO POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS; PROVIDING AN ON LINE SALES VOLUME TRACKING SERVICE FOR OTHERS; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES FOR OTHERS VIA AN ON LINE WEB SITE; PROMOTING THE GOODS OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING A WEB SITE THAT ELECTRONICALLY LINKS ON LINE BUYERS TO ON LINE SELLERS FOR THE FACILITATION OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS; PROVIDING TELEPHONE CUSTOMER SUPPORT SERVICES TO PURCHASERS AND RETAILERSACTIVE—
036FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONIC AUTHORIZATION, PROCESSING, AND MANAGEMENT OF CREDITS, CASH REFUNDS, AND EXCHANGES, BETWEEN RETAILERS AND PURCHASERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
039TEMPORARY STORAGE OF MERCHANDISE PURCHASED FROM OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 29, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 20, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 18, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 27, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 27, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance