USPTO serial 75982796
NESTLE FOODSERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2663879Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NESTLE FOODSERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey, CH
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey, CH
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christa Cole
Christa Cole Nestle USA, Inc.800 N Brand BlvdTrademark Dept - 14th FloorGlendale, CA 91203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Malted milk; liquid non-dairy coffee creamer and fortified and flavored instant malted dairy based food beverage; powdered non-dairy coffee creamer; soups; soup bases; evaporated milk; corned beef hash; chili with beans; chili without beans; beef stew; canned vegetables; canned entrees consisting primarily of meat with a sauce; canned entrees consisting primarily of meat and one or more vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee and coffee extracts; coffee with or without the mixture of other ingredients; tea and tea extracts; cocoa; canned entrees consisting primarily of pasta; pasta; macaroni and cheese; cheese sauce; salsa; sauces, excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; sauce mixes, excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; gravy mixes; seasoning mixes; bakery goods; mixes for making bakery goods; chocolate; candy; ice cream; chocolate topping; confectionery coatings consisting primarily of chocolate | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NESTLE FOODSERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |