USPTO serial 75982885
BROWNFIELD REALTY LTD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2708096Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2003
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BROWNFIELD REALTY LTD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph M. Konieczny
JOSEPH M KONIECZNY JOSEPH M. KONIECZNY, PCPO BOX 387CONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428-0387UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | environmental remediation, namely, soil, waste and/or water treatment services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 1996 |
| 042 | enviromental management, namely, hazardous waste management; environmental due diligence, namely, reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 19, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 23, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |