USPTO serial 75982929
DURO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2666905Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2002
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DURO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WATER APPLICATIONS & SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Rosemont, IL
Other trademarks owned by WATER APPLICATIONS & SYSTEMS CORPORATION
United States Filter Corporation
Palm Desert, CA
United States Filter Corporation
Palm Desert, CA
United States Filter Corporation
Palm Desert, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pumps, namely, shallow or deep well submersible pumps, sump pumps and sewage pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WATER APPLICATIONS & SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by United States Filter Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by United States Filter Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by United States Filter Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named DURO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |